On Thu, Jan 07, Jim Fehlig wrote: > The 'iscsi:iqn.2006-09.de.suse@0ac47ee2-216e-452a-a341-a12624cd0225' blob was > passed wholesale to xend, which would eat it and "do the right thing". AFAIK, > libxl is not that forgiving. I've cc'd Olaf on this thread since we recently > discussed how libvirt+libxl might support external block scripts. As I recall, > we didn't have an novel ideas.
I think the "raw" string is known to libvirts libxl driver. It could do a strncmp() and fill also ->script. Then libxl would call that thing by itself, libvirt does not need to know about such internals. Of course that would mean an additional "script=$path" is still not supported by libvirt. But thats not a loss because whoever is relying on can just copy its own file into XEN_SCRIPT_DIR. After all only our own dmmd thing requires a script because that is its whole purpose (carry the block configuration along with the vm configuration). Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
