On 1/11/16 10:49 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 11.01.16 at 17:31, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: >> There have been a good deal number of different downstreams that have >> been encouraging of changes like this but it seems like you are >> fundamentally opposed. Which is plainly discouraging to people to >> attempt to engage upstream. > > I could see such a reaction as being valid if I objected to any of > the configurability changes, but I have a hard time following when > I just ask for the default scheduler to not become configurable. > Plus I'm not the only one involved in getting to a decision here, i.e. > I can easily be overruled by other maintainers. >
I really hate to use Linux as an example here since its a different project but I will anyway. Linux has a number of flags like this were you can remove the default. The compression algorithm, the CPU schedule, the I/O scheduler. So it doesn't seem that far fetched to allow that. -- Doug Goldstein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel