On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 08:07 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 1/14/16 7:57 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:50 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 14.01.16 at 12:42, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > The bisector is working: > > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unst > > > > able > > > > /test > > > > -amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.xen-install.html > > > > > > > > and has gotten to this range: > > > > > > > > $ git log --oneline 5513bd0b4675..20c8f1a8a5fd > > > > 20c8f1a convert XSM_ENABLE to Kconfig > > > > 529298f convert FLASK_ENABLE to Kconfig > > > > 361b4f9 build: save generated xen .config > > > > e3cce17 x86/VPMU: implement ipc and arch filter flags > > > > > > > > I suspect the issue is that 529298f removes FLASK_ENABLE from the > > > > top- > > > > level, but that is used in tools/Makefile. i.e. there is that other > > > > patch > > > > which needed to go before the two included above. > > > > > > And is that other patch ready to go in? If not, do we need to > > > revert another time? > > > > I think that is likely to be the case, yes. > > > > > In any event - Doug, you should point out such dependencies in > > > the submission, e.g. after the first --- marker. > > > > Really they should have been in the same series in this case. > > > > Ian. > > > > They were all in the same thread. And were all acked. But the first one > against the tools shouldn't have been necessary, it should have still > built.
I was talking about "tools: make flask utils build unconditional" from <145 0759603-24249-1-git-send-email-car...@cardoe.com> which appears to be a singleton patch, not part of a series. Maybe that is unrelated to this breakage then? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
