On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:36 +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:46:05PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 14:30 +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:30:27PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 19:44 +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > > > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > > > > > > > Where are the bindings for cdns,uart-r1p12 defined? I don't see it > > > > mentioned in the > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt > > > > in > > > > mainline Linux. > > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > The bindings are currently in our queue: > > > https://github.com/Xilinx/linux- > > > xlnx/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns%2Cuart > > > .txt > > > > Great, thanks. > > > > > > > Does the driver need to differ at all compared with what is needed > > > > for > > > > r1p8? Normally if there is no (practical/visible) difference then > > > > in > > > > DT- > > > > world there is no need for a new compatible string, since the > > > > device is > > > > still compatible. > > > > > > > > If there are differences in the h/w but they are not relevant to > > > > our > > > > particular driven then please say so in the commit log. > > > > > > Right, there are SW visible differences (the Linux driver uses them) > > > but > > > none affecting XEN. I'll note that in the commit message. > > > > If you want to just supply some words here I'll fold them in upon > > commit. > > Or feel free to send a v2 if you prefer. > > Thanks Ian, I've inlined something here. > BTW, what is the policy for getting patches into -stable?
Please see http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Maintenance_Releases and the MAINTAIENRS file in the stable branches. TL;DR: I think this is fine and I have added to my list of things to backport. > It would be great if this patch could be taken in to have > XEN 4.6.x work out of the box on ZynqMPSoC with updated > DTBs. > > Best regards, > Edgar > > New commit message: > xen/arm: Add r1p12 to the list of supported Cadence UARTs > > Add r1p12 to the list of supported Cadence UARTs. XEN only > uses the subset of features available in r1p8, so we don't > need to differentiate between r1p8 and r1p12 yet. > > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> <pedant>It's spelled "Xen" or "xen", not "XEN"</pedant> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel