>>> On 22.01.16 at 13:12, <van.free...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:25:40AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >>In particular, with the user space exposure of clock control >>discussed in another sub-thread, the next best option would >>seem to be to handle this via emulation in a device model. Yes, >>ARM guests currently have no qemu attached to them, but I >>guess sooner or later this will need to change anyway. > > I have not look into qemu for xen. > If using qemu, then we still need to expose the clk interface to userspace?
I think so, yes. In fact - see above - the discussed userspace exposure made me consider this option. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
