as it is always acts on v->processor of the vcpu because of which we are tickling.
Getting rid of it makes the code easier to understand and better looking. While there, remove a spurious blank line. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> --- Cc: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> --- xen/common/sched_credit.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit.c b/xen/common/sched_credit.c index 671bbee..5279b92 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c @@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ boolean_param("tickle_one_idle_cpu", opt_tickle_one_idle); DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, last_tickle_cpu); -static inline void -__runq_tickle(unsigned int cpu, struct csched_vcpu *new) +static inline void __runq_tickle(struct csched_vcpu *new) { + unsigned int cpu = new->vcpu->processor; struct csched_vcpu * const cur = CSCHED_VCPU(curr_on_cpu(cpu)); struct csched_private *prv = CSCHED_PRIV(per_cpu(scheduler, cpu)); cpumask_t mask, idle_mask, *online; @@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ __runq_tickle(unsigned int cpu, struct csched_vcpu *new) cpumask_and(&idle_mask, prv->idlers, online); idlers_empty = cpumask_empty(&idle_mask); - /* * If the pcpu is idle, or there are no idlers and the new * vcpu is a higher priority than the old vcpu, run it here. @@ -980,11 +979,10 @@ static void csched_vcpu_wake(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *vc) { struct csched_vcpu * const svc = CSCHED_VCPU(vc); - const unsigned int cpu = vc->processor; BUG_ON( is_idle_vcpu(vc) ); - if ( unlikely(curr_on_cpu(cpu) == vc) ) + if ( unlikely(curr_on_cpu(vc->processor) == vc) ) { SCHED_STAT_CRANK(vcpu_wake_running); return; @@ -1028,7 +1026,7 @@ csched_vcpu_wake(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *vc) /* Put the VCPU on the runq and tickle CPUs */ __runq_insert(svc); - __runq_tickle(cpu, svc); + __runq_tickle(svc); } static void _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel