On 2/10/2016 6:18 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.02.16 at 16:50, <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
@@ -151,61 +154,52 @@ void hvm_event_guest_request(void)
      }
  }
-int hvm_event_int3(unsigned long rip)
+static inline
+uint64_t gfn_of_rip(unsigned long rip)
This should be a single line and the return value should be
unsigned long.
Noted.
+    return (uint64_t) paging_gva_to_gfn(curr, sreg.base + rip, &pfec);
  }
Pointless cast.
Noted.

--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
  #ifndef __ASM_X86_HVM_EVENT_H__
  #define __ASM_X86_HVM_EVENT_H__
+enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type
+{
+    HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT,
+    HVM_EVENT_SINGLESTEP_BREAKPOINT,
+};
I don't see what good it does to put existing constants into an
enum.
As Andrew pointed out, an enum was requested in v1 instead of the single_step param. One could use the already existing VM_EVENT_REASON_* constants, but conceptually this
function only involves a subset of those (i.e. *breakpoint vm-events*).

@@ -27,9 +33,8 @@ bool_t hvm_event_cr(unsigned int index, unsigned long value,
  #define hvm_event_crX(what, new, old) \
      hvm_event_cr(VM_EVENT_X86_##what, new, old)
  void hvm_event_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t value);
-/* Called for current VCPU: returns -1 if no listener */
-int hvm_event_int3(unsigned long rip);
-int hvm_event_single_step(unsigned long rip);
+int hvm_event_breakpoint(unsigned long rip,
+                         enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type type);
I guess the comment was here for a reason, and this reason doesn't
go away with this code folding. But I'll leave it to the VM event code
maintainers to judge.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


That comment seemed & still seems wrong to me, I don't see any code paths out of which that function would return -1.

Thank you,
Corneliu.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to