On 2/10/2016 6:30 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.02.16 at 17:26, <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
On 10.02.16 at 16:52, <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
xen/arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +
xen/arch/x86/Makefile | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/monitor_x86.c | 72 ++++++++
xen/common/Kconfig | 20 +++
xen/common/Makefile | 1 +
xen/common/domctl.c | 2 +-
xen/{arch/x86 => common}/monitor.c | 195 +++++++++-------------
xen/include/asm-arm/{monitor.h => monitor_arch.h} | 34 +++-
xen/include/asm-x86/monitor_arch.h | 74 ++++++++
xen/include/{asm-x86 => xen}/monitor.h | 17 +-
13 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/monitor_x86.c
rename xen/{arch/x86 => common}/monitor.c (44%)
rename xen/include/asm-arm/{monitor.h => monitor_arch.h} (46%)
create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-x86/monitor_arch.h
rename xen/include/{asm-x86 => xen}/monitor.h (74%)
With percentages as low as 44 I'm not sure all this strange
renaming and introduction of oddly named new files is actually a
good idea.
Also it looks like this moving around of files needs to be
accompanied by adjustments to ./MAINTAINERS.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Will check that, indeed these might have broken something there.
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
