On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 10:30 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > >> On 02/15/2016 08:35 AM, Corneliu ZUZU wrote: >> >>> This patch merges almost identical functions hvm_event_int3 and >>> hvm_event_single_step into a single function called hvm_event_breakpoint. >>> Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com> >>> --- >>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c | 108 >>> +++++++++++++++++++--------------------- >>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 15 +++--- >>> xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h | 11 ++-- >>> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) >>> >> Looks good to me. >> >> Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Razvan >> >> If the patch hasn't been merged to staging yet then include it. If it's a longer series the cover page can indicate which patches are still in need of review and which ones have been already acked. Furthermore, for each patch under the Signed-off-by tag you can say what changed in each revision. If nothing changed, you can say no change or just don't put anything for that revision. See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg00943.html for an example. Also keep in mind that if the changes in a revision are significant enough you can't keep the Acked-by tag on the patch, it will need to be re-acked. Tamas
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
