On 17/02/16 16:38, Jan Beulich wrote: > Afaict this was never necessary on a 64-bit hypervisor, and was instead > just blindly cloned over from 32-bit code: We don't fiddle with (and > hence don't reload) any of DS, ES, FS, or GS, and an exception on IRET > itself can equally well be reported to the guest as that very exception > on the target of that IRET. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
As best as I can tell, this looks safe. Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> This is one area I intend to write an XTF test for, but I havn't had time to yet. I will see if I can dig out the start of the test and complete it. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
