> From: Xu, Quan
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:34 PM
> 
> > On February 18, 2016 2:16pm, <Tian, Kevin> wrote:
> > > From: Xu, Quan
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:38 PM
> > > >
> > > > > BTW, with patch 1/7, I can build Xen successfully( make xen ).
> > > > > To align this rule, I'd better merge patch1/7 and patch 2/7 into a
> > > > > large patch.
> > > >
> > > > Not having looked at patch 2 yet
> > > > (I'm about to),
> > >
> > > Good news. :):)
> > > I think there are maybe some minor issues for this patch set (
> > > _my_estimate_), and I will address these issues immediately.
> > >
> >
> > Hi, Quan, are you expecting people to continue looking at your v5, or 
> > better to
> > wait for v7? :-)
> >
> 
> V7?

sorry. I meant v6.

> I think the other people would better wait for v6. I plan to send out v6 in 
> next week.
> Jan gave some valuable comments for v5. I will fix it ASAP.
> I apologize to everyone who has to go through v5 patch set. I missed some v4
> comments and didn't fully test the v5 patch set, as I tried my best to send 
> out v5 on the
> last
> working day before Chinese Spring Festival and it was a long periods for v4 
> discussion.
> 

Thanks for your work.
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to