On Thu, Feb 18, Wei Liu wrote: > Sorry I don't follow. What do you mean by 1:1 copy? Why does it make the > update unnecessary?
The current code does: libxl_device_nic_init(&nic_saved); libxl_device_nic_copy(CTX, &nic_saved, nic); nic->devid = libxl__device_nextid(gc, domid, "vif"); libxl__update_config_nic(gc, &nic_saved, nic); Which is equivalent to the more obvious version: libxl_device_nic_init(&nic_saved); nic->devid = libxl__device_nextid(gc, domid, "vif"); libxl_device_nic_copy(CTX, &nic_saved, nic); The input gets modified either way. Is it expected that future versions of libxl_device_nic/vtmp_copy will not duplicate the mac/uuid parts? Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel