On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 29.02.16 at 04:00, <feng...@intel.com> wrote: > > This is the core logic handling for VT-d posted-interrupts. > > Basically it > > deals with how and when to update posted-interrupts during the > > following > > scenarios: > > - vCPU is preempted > > - vCPU is slept > > - vCPU is blocked > > > [...] > > CC: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org> > > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> > > CC: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> > > CC: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > > Suggested-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zh...@intel.com> > > Suggested-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > > Suggested-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng...@intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > With the comments George gave on v13 subsequent to this tag > I'm not sure it was correct to retain it. George? > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > albeit in case another version is needed ... > And, if I'm still in time (if not, no big deal :-))
Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> Also, personally, I don't think that all those Suggested-by add much useful info, and I'd be fine to see mine one removed (in any case, but even more so, if the Rev-by: above is applied). But, again, no big deal. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
