>>> On 28.02.16 at 12:18, <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,18 @@
> #define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64 unsigned long long
> #define ACPI_MAP_MEM_ATTR PAGE_HYPERVISOR
>
> +/* Tables marked as reserved in efi table */
> +typedef enum {
> + TBL_FADT,
> + TBL_MADT,
> + TBL_STAO,
> + TBL_XSDT,
> + TBL_RSDP,
> + TBL_EFIT,
> + TBL_MMAP,
> + TBL_MMAX,
> +} EFI_MEM_RES;
> +
> bool_t __init acpi_psci_present(void);
> bool_t __init acpi_psci_hvc_present(void);
> void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void);
This patch apparently expected the other series to be fully applied
first, which afaics hasn't been stated anywhere. I've fixed up the
context, but please avoid the committer needing to do such by
explicitly stating interdependencies between individually submitted
series, or by keeping the later series RFC (making clear it is not
expected to go in yet).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
