>>> On 25.03.16 at 19:47, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:14:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Something is off with your patch. This is 5/4 :-)
Well, yes - this got added later on top of the previously sent series, to make the dependency obvious. >> Instead of addressing these fields via the base of the stack (which >> uniformly requires 4-byte displacements), address them from the end >> (which for everything other than guest_cpu_user_regs requires just >> 1-byte ones). This yields a code size reduction somewhere between 8k >> and 12k in my builds. > > Also you made the macro a bit different - the %r is removed. > > Particular reason? This is an integral part of the change, so the macro can derive e.g. both %eax and %rax from the passed argument Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
