On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 14:00 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 08/04/16 13:52, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 08/04/16 02:23, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > > Thanks! > > > > Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > Committers: > > Hopefully the arinc653 maintainers will get an opportunity to take a > look at this before the hard freeze today. But if not, given the > timing, and the fact that the patch is really more to do with the > interface to the scheduling system as a whole rather than internal > algorithms of the arinc scheduler, I think it's probably OK to take > the > liberty of checking it in even without an Ack (as long as there's no > Nack). We can always revert / amend it later if there are > objections. > Thanks George,
FWIW, I do agree, and I'm up for fixing any issue that could be raised, or any bug that could surface in ARINC code because of this, super quickly, during the rc period. Now, a much easier but I guess technically relevant question: assuming that you (George) also like and Ack patch 8, should I (and this is for committers) resend the series, or do you guys can fetch it from the git branch and/or list (with the correct version of patch 8 being the one attached to the reply to Juergen's further comments)? Thanks again and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
