On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> I want to clarify now then what our exist path is, do we need to care > >> about legacy crap ? > > > > exist? Existing? > > Sorry I meant 'exit path'. > > > And by 'legacy crap' you mean 'pvops' - then the answer is no. > > Not pvops -- but hardware without hardware virtualization bells and > whistles, are we then simply not going to need to support this old > crap hardware?
Yes, HVMLite means - HVM without QEMU. As in HVM without having to emulate legacy hardware. > > > The big existing use-case of pvops is to boot Linux as initial domain. > > If we can swap it over to PVH/HVMLite then that frees us from having to > > use pvops. > > Right. > > Luis _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
