On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 3194ac6e66cc ("arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier.")
> >
> > from the arm64 tree and commit:
> >
> > 3915fea959b6 ("ARM: XEN: Move xen_early_init() before efi_init()")
> >
> > from the xen-tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Thanks Stephen, looks good to me.
It looks good to me too.
> > diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index 65f515949baa,7cf992fe6684..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@@ -277,13 -336,13 +278,11 @@@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p
> >
> > early_ioremap_reset();
> >
> > - if (acpi_disabled) {
> > - unflatten_device_tree();
> > + if (acpi_disabled)
> > psci_dt_init();
> > - } else {
> > + else
> > psci_acpi_init();
> > - }
> >
> > - xen_early_init();
> > -
> > cpu_read_bootcpu_ops();
> > smp_init_cpus();
> > smp_build_mpidr_hash();
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
