>>> On 28.04.16 at 09:14, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: >> From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com] >> Sent: 28 April 2016 03:47 >> Besides, do you think it acceptable we just replace p2m_mmio_write_dm >> with p2m_ioreq_server in next version, or should we remove this p2m >> type and define p2m_ioreq_server with a different value? :) >> > > p2m_ioreq_server becomes defunct after the aforementioned patch. With that > patch applied there will be no way to set that type on a p2m entry so it > should be ok to re-use the type.
s/p2m_ioreq_server/p2m_mmio_write_dm/ ? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
