On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item > >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html > >> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6 > >> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the > >> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and > >> possibly misleading. > > > > FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't > > seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend. > > Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as > an ack (and a release ack for one)? >
Doesn't this need an ack from member(s) of the security team before it can be committed? It is related to an XSA after all. I don't have clear idea how to proceed in this case TBH. In any case: Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> And subject to an ack from security team member: Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> Wei. > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
