> From: Tamas K Lengyel [mailto:ta...@tklengyel.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 3:09 AM > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com> wrote: > > The return value has not been clearly defined, with the function > > never returning 0 which seemingly indicated a condition where the > > guest should crash. In this patch we define -rc as error condition > > where the notification was not sent, 0 where the notification was sent > > and the vCPU is not paused and 1 that the notification was sent and > > that the vCPU is paused. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com> > > --- > > Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com> > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> > > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > Pinging the rest of the maintainers to get an update on this patch. > Current status is: > > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
