Ping! Thanks, Bhaktipriya
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:45:08PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote: >> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency >> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues >> just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the >> use of system_wq. >> >> Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue created with create_workqueue(), >> system_wq allows multiple work items to overlap executions even on >> the same CPU; however, a per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU >> locality or global ordering guarantees unless the target CPU is >> explicitly specified and thus the increase of local concurrency shouldn't >> make any difference. >> >> Since the work items could be pending, flush_work() has been used in >> xen_pcibk_disconnect(). xen_pcibk_xenbus_remove() calls free_pdev() >> which in turn calls xen_pcibk_disconnect() for every pdev to ensure that >> there is no pending task while disconnecting the driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriy...@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel