> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a > little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We > have > - osstest.git > - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been > inactive for a while (not very clear to me what these do) > - and we have old and inactive xentesttools/*.git
They are not inactive. I have some patches for it and we are using it (Boris and me). > - and we are adding a new repo for XTF > > > Maybe, moving everything test related under testing/* or test/* would be > sensible, but that would cause some disruption (not sure how bad that > would be). It would address A, B and D. It wouldn't make C much worse than > now. I don't mind the xentesttools going under a 'test' directory. > > We already follow a similar pattern for out-of-tree via pvdrivers/* > > It does in fact occur to me that some of the older inactive repos should > be archived somehow: candidates seem to be kemari/*, xentesttools/*, > xenclient/*, xcp/*, ... pollute the namespace. If we are concerned about > the namespace, we should address this at some point. There are also some > inactive top level git repos such as linux-2.5-xen.git and quite a few > inactive people repos. The Linux ones, the linux-pvops.git could go. > > >Lars, can you please advise what process we need to use to come to > >closure on this decision ? > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
