On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 13:48 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 07/07/16 12:03, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 10:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > > Could you re-send this with the trace change moved from the > > > previous > > > patch to this patch? > > > > > So, you're saying I should change both Xen, xentrace_format and > > xenalyze.c all at once, in the same patch, right? > > > But now that xenalyze is in-tree, I think we want to avoid situations > where the in-tree xenalyze is broken, even just for one changeset, if > we > can avoid it. > Ok, this makes sense. Will do.
Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
