On 09/08/16 11:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int mtrr_add_page(unsigned long base, un
> if ((type == MTRR_TYPE_WRCOMB) && !have_wrcomb()) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "mtrr: your processor doesn't support
> write-combining\n");
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Will this break the classic-xen MTRR code? ISTR it was very picky, from
the cpuid work. Also, as some further cleanup, that printk should
become a print-once.
The others look ok.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
