On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcg...@kernel.org wrote: > Please let me know if there are any issue or questions.
Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure why anyone should care. I have no idea what problem it solves, despite reading a couple dozen messages in the thread, and the most recent two 0/x intro messages. Its purpose seems to be ensuring that lld.llvm.org has more work to do if it ever wants to build the kernel without binutils? I also am not certain why every revision of it is cc'd to linux-sh. Is it generic linker infrastructure change, or is it something that affects this architecture specifically? As far as I can tell nothing in this most recent 7-patch series touches arch/sh at all, you just cc'd our list because you think the work you're doing is _important_, not that it's specifically relevant to us. Rob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
