On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Dario Faggioli
<dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 19:17 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> If there are idle pcpus inside the waking vcpu's
>> soft-affinity mask, we should really tickle one
>> of them (this is one of the purposes of the
>> __runq_tickle() function itself!), not just
>> any idle pcpu.
>>
>> The issue has been introduced in 02ea5031825d
>> ("credit1: properly deal with pCPUs not in any cpupool"),
>> where the usage of idle_mask is changed, without
>> updating the bottom of the function, where it
>> is also referenced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
