Hi Konrad,
On 19/09/2016 22:19, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
I forgot to mention that with those NITs fixed:
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>
Thanks.
However I noticed (and I recall having it replaced in earlier
versions so I must have in a hurry missed it), but this:
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct bug_frame {
".popsection\n" \
".pushsection .bug_frames." __stringify(type) ", \"a\",
%progbits\n"\
"4:\n" \
+ ".align 4\n" \
[fixed up, your mailer mangled it]
This should have been:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h
index 773d63e..affe64f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/bug.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct bug_frame {
".popsection\n" \
".pushsection .bug_frames." __stringify(type) ", \"a\", %progbits\n"\
"4:\n" \
- ".align 4\n" \
+ ".p2align 4\n" \
".long (1b - 4b)\n" \
".long (2b - 4b)\n" \
".long (3b - 4b)\n" \
So that it would be in sync with x86 version.
The end result is exactly the same - it is just that p2align is
preferred because it has the same semantics across platforms while
.align differs.
I made the change (along with your recommendations) and put your
Reviewed-by. I hope that is OK.
I am fine with that.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
