Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Device model operation hypercall (DMOP, re qemu depriv) [and 1 more messages]"): > On 21.09.16 at 15:24, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > Would this be enough of an improvement, for you, to be worth the > > additional type name clutter etc. ? > > Again this looks like much clutter with little benefit to me, i.e. I'd > then rather go with the unmodified original proposal. That's largely > because nothing really enforces anyone to use the (disconnected) > xen_dmop_foo_entry type. I.e. it continues to be a matter of the > programmer's and the reviewers' attention/discipline.
Fair enough. Thanks for your opinions. Regards, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel