On 09/22/2016 11:12 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:25:33AM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 09/21/2016 08:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
. print a better error code.
Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
---
tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c b/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c
index 2de04c0..f11e71f07f 100644
--- a/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c
+++ b/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c
@@ -100,8 +100,11 @@ static int list_func(int argc, char *argv[])
rc = xc_livepatch_list(xch, MAX_LEN, idx, info, name, len, &done,
&left);
if ( rc )
{
- fprintf(stderr, "Failed to list %d/%d: %d(%s)!\n",
- idx, left, errno, strerror(errno));
+ if ( errno == ENOSYS )
+ fprintf(stderr, "Hypervisor compiled without Xen
Livepatching!\n");
+ else
+ fprintf(stderr, "Failed to list %d/%d: %d(%s)!\n",
+ idx, left, errno, strerror(errno));
break;
}
if ( !idx )
You should save errno since you have an fprintf before you check it.
I am missing something.
Why would fprintf mess up 'errno' ?
If the first fprintf fails for whatever reason (e.g. ENOSPC), then it
will set errno and the subsequent check of errno afterwards will serve
no purpose.
I have a patch to fix this issue for the rest of xen-livepatch.c, and
will send it out shortly.
--
Ross Lagerwall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel