>>> On 28.09.16 at 15:31, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 28/09/16 13:00, Jan Beulich wrote: >> For consumers not using (fully) C99-aware compilers, limit the number >> of places where tweaking of the headers would be necessary: Introduce >> and use xen_mk_ullong(), allowing its helper macro to be overridden at >> once. > > I'm just curious: Did you actually run across someone who had an issue > with this?
No. I just noticed in the context of https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-09/msg02913.html that the problem is more widespread than just that patch. > And for non-C99-aware compilers, what would people typically > have to put instead to get a 64-bit ULL there? Windows compilers typically support a UI64 suffix. Other compilers might use yet something else. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel