On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:46:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > +#else
> > +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
> as ...
>
> > @@ -1251,6 +1301,8 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
> > } *extra, *extra_head = NULL;
> > #endif
> >
> > + free_ebmalloc_unused_mem();
>
> ... the whole function here doesn't get built on ARM.
>
> Julien - we're still awaiting your input on general aspects here.
Julien, ping? I would like to go forward with this patchset. Could
you tell us is current solution OK for you (of course except this
stupid build issue spotted by Jan)? Should anything change?
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
