It doesn't make sense since the idle domain doesn't receive any events. This
is relevant in order to be sure that hypercall_preempt_check is not called
by the idle domain, which would happen previously when calling
{hap/sh}_set_allocation during domain 0 creation.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Expand commit message.
---
xen/include/asm-x86/event.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/event.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/event.h
index a82062e..d589d6f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/event.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/event.h
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ int hvm_local_events_need_delivery(struct vcpu *v);
static inline int local_events_need_delivery(void)
{
struct vcpu *v = current;
+
+ ASSERT(!is_idle_vcpu(v));
+
return (has_hvm_container_vcpu(v) ? hvm_local_events_need_delivery(v) :
(vcpu_info(v, evtchn_upcall_pending) &&
!vcpu_info(v, evtchn_upcall_mask)));
--
2.7.4 (Apple Git-66)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
