>>> On 03.11.16 at 10:59, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote: > Found an earlier version of the patch, proposing to extend > HVMOP_inject_trap instead of a new libxc hypercall, which apparently got > so far as to have an "Acked-by" and a "Reviewed-by": > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg01244.html > > Is this one worth bringing back with the new information?
Considering the discussion we had here, I'm not convinced. As said before, I think the issue wants addressing in the hypervisor alone. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
