On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 06:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> The only architecture that was not tested was avr32 and that is >> because linux-next fails to compile on it. I'd like to greatly thank Guenter >> Roeck for his help with testing. > > We have a real board here. I would try to check if you provide a git url > to your stuff.
I provided the git URL below, I will highlight it below again. > I can confirm that breakage happened like in last couple of month. > v4.10-rc3 can't be compiled either. You mean an avr32 board ? >> The debug patch which force enables the test driver is not submitted >> for >> upstream inclusion but is kept as part of the public tree for those >> curious, >> its the last patch [1]. This tree is based on linux-next tag next- >> 20170109. >> >> [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161222023811.21246-1-mcg...@kernel.org >> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux- >> next.git/log/?h=20170109-linker-tables-v6 Here is the git tree, note last patch is a debug patch which was not submitted, it force enables the debug test linktable patch, you do want that for your testing though. > Series is fine to me > > FWIW: > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Great thanks for the review! Luis _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel