This contains the two corrections pointed out by Jan Beulich
for the kexec STATUS call just introduced.

Note: In kexec_status(), the use of test_bit() can also return
EPERM, so the return value from test_bit() must be checked to
ensure that kexec_status() always returns 0, 1 or -1, per the
public header description.

Note: My handling of the test_bit() scenario is to explicitly
check for return value of 1, so any value other than 1 causes
kexec_status to return 0.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to