> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
> index 243df96..4d555b1 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,40 @@ struct vcpu *__init alloc_dom0_vcpu0(struct domain
> *dom0)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
> -static bool_t __initdata opt_dom0_shadow;
> +bool __initdata opt_dom0_shadow;
> boolean_param("dom0_shadow", opt_dom0_shadow);
This (boolean_param) is not needed any longer.
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> index 0ccef1d..f52f269 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> @@ -1545,6 +1545,15 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
> if ( opt_dom0pvh )
> domcr_flags |= DOMCRF_pvh | DOMCRF_hap;
>
> + if ( dom0_pvh )
> + {
> + panic("Building a PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet supported.");
> + domcr_flags |= DOMCRF_hvm |
> + ((hvm_funcs.hap_supported && !opt_dom0_shadow) ?
> + DOMCRF_hap : 0);
This probably has been discussed already --- are we going to support
shadow paging for PVH?
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
