On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 10:17 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Dario Faggioli > <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > Information we currently print for idle pCPUs is > > I take it you meant "idle vCPUs here"? > Sort-of. What I actually meant is that we print info about the idle vCPUs for all pCPUs that happen to be idle during the dump, which is redundant bcause such info about the status of idle vCPUs are not very interesting or useful, and never change.
So, basically, yes, I agree that switching from 'pCPUs' to 'vCPUs' in that sentence makes what I tried to explain above much easier to understand. > If so I can fix that up on check-in. > Great, go ahead. > Other than that: > > Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel