On 23/02/17 16:09, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.02.17 at 16:27, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >> I also don't see much benefit from deviating from what HVM does, so I would >> just leave it as is. > Understood. The risk is that in a couple of years time understanding > why it is the way it is and (whether that's necessary) may take as > much effort as did the deciphering of the (buggy) hvmloader > setup code for this.
In which case, just leave a short comment saying something like "Copy HVMLoader for consistency, not that we expect a PVH domain from using this for anything other than their AP trampoline". ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
