On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:42 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > Most of the motion makes sense, but moving the option parser along > too > seems a bit strange. Wouldn't it make more sense to leave it with > the > other option parsers? > Well, it's a runqueue related parameter, so it's runqueue related code, and this is why I moved it.
_BUT_ after all, I think I agree with you. More specifically, I think that either all the option parser are in "sections" where they belong, depending on the option they take care of, or they all live together. So, yes, let's keep them together. I'll see about moving each one in a more specific place in the file and, if I decide to go for it, send a patch. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
