>>> On 23.02.17 at 12:52, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > And then remove hvm_vioapic (since it just contains a hvm_hw_ioapic struct > now). This is a preparatory change for introducing support for multiple vIO > APICs per domain.
Having gone through the rest of this series, I think the replacing of vioapic pointers by domain ones goes too far here. Especially the low level functions really ought to be dealing with individual IO-APICs instead of their entire set. Hence where a domain pointer is needed, I think it should be added without removing the vioapic one. In the end - what's the fundamental need you try to address with the patch here? I.e. with multiple IO-APICs, what's wrong with still having a "back pointer" to the domain in each of the structures? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
