On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:09:15AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> If the latter check was moved to the caller, the whole function
> would perhaps be better placed in nestedsvm.c?

I thought about putting it in nestedsvm.c but I thought having it as a
static function would be better.  I could move it to nestedsvm.c 
though.

> Can you please avoid "== 0" and "== 1" on boolean fields (even
> if, like in the case here, the bitfield has u64 as underlying type,
> which is sort of pointless)?
> 
> Jan

svm.c is older and uses "== X", and I was trying to keep it consistent
within the file.  For things like if () {\n,} \{, which are
inconsistent, I always use if () \n \{.  Should I only be using boolean?

-- 
Brian Woods

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to