On 02/07/2018 05:22 PM, Simon Gaiser wrote:
As the previous commit shows it's quite easy to confuse the transaction
reference counting by ending a transaction twice. So at least try to
detect and report it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Gaiser <si...@invisiblethingslab.com>
---
  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
index 3e59590c7254..aed954b09b9b 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
@@ -137,11 +137,20 @@ static uint32_t xs_request_enter(struct xb_req_data *req)
void xs_request_exit(struct xb_req_data *req)
  {
+       unsigned int users_old;
+
        spin_lock(&xs_state_lock);
+       users_old = xs_state_users;
        xs_state_users--;
        if ((req->type == XS_TRANSACTION_START && req->msg.type == XS_ERROR) ||
            req->type == XS_TRANSACTION_END)
                xs_state_users--;
+       if (WARN_ON(xs_state_users > users_old))


WARN_ON_ONCE()?

-boris


+               /*
+                * Someone misused XS_TRANSACTION_{START,END}. Reset the
+                * reference counter so we might survive.
+                */
+               xs_state_users = 0;
        spin_unlock(&xs_state_lock);
if (xs_suspend_active && !xs_state_users)


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to