The bit definition for the CPUID mask in the GICv2 LR register was
wrong, fortunately the current implementation does not use that bit.
Fix it up (it's starting at bit 10, not bit 9) and clean up some
nearby definitions on the way.
This will be used by the new VGIC shortly.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@linaro.org>
---
Changelog RFC ... v1:
- new patch
 xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
index 618dd94120..031be920cc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
@@ -57,10 +57,11 @@
 #define GICH_V2_LR_HW_MASK         0x1
 #define GICH_V2_LR_GRP_SHIFT       30
 #define GICH_V2_LR_GRP_MASK        0x1
-#define GICH_V2_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ (1<<19)
-#define GICH_V2_LR_GRP1            (1<<30)
-#define GICH_V2_LR_HW              (1<<31)
-#define GICH_V2_LR_CPUID_SHIFT     9
+#define GICH_V2_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ (1U << 19)
+#define GICH_V2_LR_GRP1            (1U << 30)
+#define GICH_V2_LR_HW              (1U << GICH_V2_LR_HW_SHIFT)
+#define GICH_V2_LR_CPUID_SHIFT     10
+#define GICH_V2_LR_CPUID_MASK      0x7
 #define GICH_V2_VTR_NRLRGS         0x3f
 
 #define GICH_V2_VMCR_PRIORITY_MASK   0x1f
-- 
2.14.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to