> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 2:59 AM > > We currently have MSR_IA32_APICBASE and MSR_IA32_APICBASE_MSR > which are > synonymous from a naming point of view, but refer to very different things. > > Rename the x2APIC MSRs to MSR_X2APIC_*, which are shorter constants > and > visually separate the register function from the generic APIC name. For the > case ranges, introduce MSR_X2APIC_LAST, rather than relying on the > knowledge > that there are 0x3ff MSRs architecturally reserved for x2APIC functionality. > > For functionality relating to the APIC_BASE MSR, use MSR_APIC_BASE for > the MSR > itself, but drop the MSR prefix from the other constants to shorten the > names. > In all cases, the fact that we are dealing with the APIC_BASE MSR is obvious > from the context. > > No functional change (the combined binary is identical). > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > --- > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > CC: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com> > CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> >
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel