Hi Jan,

On 03/15/2018 08:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.03.18 at 19:20, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
From: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>

At the same time replace _mfn(0) by INVALID_MFN or drop the initializer
when it is not necessary. This will make clearer that the MFN
initialized is not valid.

Other than _mfn(0) -> INVALID_MFN, no functional change intended.

There's no such transformation in the patch, so I think it would
be better if you said "0" or "MFN 0" instead of "_mfn(0)" in both
instances above.

Good point. I will update the commit message.


Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>

Thank you!

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to