From: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> [ Upstream commit 58e636039b512697554b579c2bb23774061877f5 ]
In cpu_bringup() there is a call of preempt_disable() without a paired preempt_enable(). This is not needed as interrupts are off initially. Additionally this will result in early boot messages like: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0/0x00000002 Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825113158.11716-1-jgr...@suse.com Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> --- arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c index 41fd4c123165..7b6e56703bb9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static void cpu_bringup(void) cpu_init(); touch_softlockup_watchdog(); - preempt_disable(); /* PVH runs in ring 0 and allows us to do native syscalls. Yay! */ if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel)) { -- 2.30.2
