Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> IMO it would be good to modify the commit message so it covers the
> fact that the emulated host bridge on Arm does not advertise IO port
> support, so the guest is capable of realizing IO BARs are not
> supported.
Yes.
> Otherwise it seems like the toolstack is ignoring a failure which
> could cause a device to malfunction when passed though (which is still
> the case, but the guest will be able to notice).
Quite.
Thanks,
Ian.
