On 06.12.2021 17:06, Julien Grall wrote: > On 06/12/2021 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 06.12.2021 15:28, Julien Grall wrote: >>> I am not going to ack it but I am also not going to Nack it if another >>> maintainer agrees with your approach. >> >> FTAOD I'll be giving it a week or so, but unless I get an outright NAK, >> I'm now in a position to put this in with Luca's R-b. > > From the check-in policy section in MAINTAINERS: > > 4. There must be no "open" objections. > > So I think this cannot be check-in given two maintainers disagree on the > approach. That said, as I wrote earlier my condition for not Nacking is > another maintainer agree with your approach.
Hmm, I did address both your and Ian's concerns in v2, admittedly by only going as far as minimally necessary. I therefore wouldn't call this an "open objection". Jan
