On 15.02.22 14:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.02.2022 12:54, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 15.02.22 13:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 15.02.2022 12:45, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>> I'm on your side, I just want to hear that we all agree pcidevs
>>>> needs to be converted into rwlock according with the plan you
>>>> suggested and at least now it seems to be an acceptable solution.
>>> I'd like to express worries though about the conversion of this
>>> recursive lock into an r/w one.
>> Could you please elaborate more on this?
> Not sure what to say beyond the obvious:
I thought you have something specific in your mind that worries
you and you can tell what it is. Thus the qustion
> At the time of the conversion,
> there certainly was an issue to be solved. You'd need to solve this
> issue differently then. Plus you'd need to make sure that no further
> incarnations of the original issue had been there or have been added in
> the meantime.
>
> Jan
>
Thank you,
Oleksandr
